[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS is the `released version'
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CVS is the `released version' |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 14:48:44 -0400 |
I don't like the idea of having a package system for Emacs. First of all,
it clearly is not needed. Second, it would invite programmers to put
a lot of work into a mechanism instead of putting it into improvements
in what Emacs can actually do.
Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/09
Re: CVS is the `released version', Chong Yidong, 2007/05/09
Re: CVS is the `released version', Ken Manheimer, 2007/05/10
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/10
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/10
- Re: CVS is the `released version',
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CVS is the `released version', joakim, 2007/05/11
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/12
- Re: CVS is the `released version', joakim, 2007/05/12
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Ryan Yeske, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Ralf Angeli, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/13
Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/14
Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/14