[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:09:47 -0400 |
By the way, could you (or somebody else) be a little bit more verbose
about Tramp being "hairy"? What would you like to be changed?
"Hairy" is not a criticism. It just means Tramp is complex, and has
complex interactions. Therefore, changes in it could easily break
something.
However, from what you've said, it sounds like THIS upgrade to Tramp
should go into 22.2. Would you please install it in EMACS_22_BASE?
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Johan Bockgård, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David House, 2007/06/09
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/06/08
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/10
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/11
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13