[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:25:53 +0900 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> That's what I would consider sort of speaking against a merge right
> now: it might cause unnecessary work (later likely to be reverted) at
> other locations.
FWIW, I've been periodically merging the trunk into the multi-tty
branch, and there haven't been any notable conflicts, so perhaps there's
no rush.
-Miles
--
"Suppose He doesn't give a shit? Suppose there is a God but He
just doesn't give a shit?" [George Carlin]
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David House, 2007/06/09
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/06/08
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/10
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/11
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/11
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/12
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jason Rumney, 2007/06/12
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/12
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Chong Yidong, 2007/06/12