emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored


From: Thien-Thi Nguyen
Subject: Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:34:43 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux)

() Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
() Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:18:02 -0500

   It's reliable in that we know which buffer it is, but that doesn't
   mean it's the right buffer.  Isn't it often a hidden buffer like *vc*
   rather than the vc-status buffer itself?

I don't know.  I tested w/ vc.el using `C-x v g' so there was no
vc-status buffer.  (Am i missing something?)

What is the scenario where there is a vc-status buffer to worry about?
The change is checked in; please try it and let me know w/ a concrete
(non-hypothetical) test case, for problems you encounter.

Note that the most recent change (checking liveness in then sentinel)
should have nothing to do w/ the original setq mode-line-process.

thi




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]