RE: Simple Tasks, new TODO category

[Drew Adams]

> From: Lennart Borgman
> You misread my suggestion. I suggested using char number 1. Perhaps
> there is some better character?

> From: Jason Rumney
> I understood "char number 1" to mean \001 (C-q C-a), not the digit 1.
> But I think that is too obscure, it would be better to explicitly define
> the access key, as in (define-key ...  '(menu-item ... :access-key ?a)).

Sorry for misunderstanding. I thought you meant that when `_' was the first
character of a menu item (name) it was to be interpreted as an instruction,
or something like that.