Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like

[dhruva]

Hi,
 I would consider the ability to convert to other repository formats
as important too. Whatever VCS gets adopted must not lose any history
data and have enough metadata to be able to convert to other VCS
formats. Though I am biased towards mercurial, there is one git
feature I consider very good. Ability to run a git server for existing
cvs clients. Though this might be contradictory to dVCS concepts (not
too sure though)

-dky

On 1/24/08, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 3:43 PM, Mark A. Hershberger <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Another reason to prefer it: stand-alone bzr binaries are available and
> > work *now* in Windows.
>
> That's also true of mercurial, monotone, darcs and git, depending of
> how you do define "work now".
>
>              Juanma
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

Contents reflect my personal views only!