[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release plans
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Release plans |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Aug 2008 13:38:35 +0200 |
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 03:33, Richard M. Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well then, Emacs on Windows has in at least one case brought someone
> more or less all the way to freedom. If this happens often, then it could
> amount to a good reason to have Emacs run on Windows.
You're setting a harsh standard for Emacs on Windows. Even GNU/Linux
fails to bring many people "all the way to freedom", because they
still use proprietary software (present in most distributions).
Of course the Windows port's impact is perhaps tiny, but, on the other
hand, is not like maintaining it is sapping the Emacs developers'
resource pool.
Excuse me if I'm wrong, but I read this thread as if you were thinking
of dropping Windows support on Emacs. I fail to see how that would
help freedom. It certainly wouldn't help mine.
Juanma
- Re: Release plans, Bastien, 2008/08/01
- Re: Release plans, Frank Schmitt, 2008/08/01
- Re: Release plans, Miles Bader, 2008/08/01
- Re: Release plans, Richard M Stallman, 2008/08/02
- Re: Release plans, Frank Schmitt, 2008/08/02
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/02
- Re: Release plans,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/03
- Re: Release plans, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/08/03
- Re: Release plans, Davi Leal, 2008/08/04
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/05
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/11
- Re: Release plans, Miles Bader, 2008/08/12
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/12
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/12
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/12
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/13