[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET merge question
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET merge question |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:37:56 -0400 |
I ask because the CEDET merge already involves an uncomfortably large
amount of code, and it's rather dismaying to see these two big code
trees "embedded" in subdirectories of Semantic. (Wisent, for instance,
appears to be an entire Elisp reimplementation of Bison...)
Is it possible to use Bison itself rather than implement the
same functionality differently? Or perhaps add an option
to Bison to output its data in whatever format is convenient?
- CEDET merge question, Chong Yidong, 2009/09/05
- Re: CEDET merge question, David Engster, 2009/09/05
- Re: CEDET merge question,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CEDET merge question, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/06
- Re: CEDET merge question, David Engster, 2009/09/06
- Re: CEDET merge question, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/06
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/07
- Re: CEDET merge question, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/12
- Re: CEDET merge question, Miles Bader, 2009/09/12
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/13
- Re: CEDET merge question, tomas, 2009/09/14
- Re: CEDET merge question, Miles Bader, 2009/09/14
- Re: CEDET merge question, tomas, 2009/09/14