Re: next emacs version?

[Óscar Fuentes]

Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:

>> Unless you want to start putting bzr revision numbers into the emacs
>> version string (which I think is a bad idea), that's going to be the
>> case.
>
> But perhaps having the bzr version available in another variable in
> the build Emacs would be a good idea?

It would be useful to include bzr's revision id (not revision number)
along the info sent by M-x report-emacs-bug.