[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Structural regular expressions
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: Structural regular expressions |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:23:19 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Tom <levelhalom <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So if such "multiple narrowing" is implemented it must maintain the
boundaries
> > between the different ranges and shouldn't simply handle it as
contiguous text.
>
> Or handle the text outside the multiple narrowing as whitespace.
>
And what happens then if I want to regexp replace "foo\s-*bar"? It would
still be susceptible to the above mentioned boundary problem, so it's
not a robust workaround.
- Re: Structural regular expressions, (continued)
- Re: Structural regular expressions, tomas, 2010/09/11
- RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/11
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/11
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/12
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/12
- RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/12
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/12
- RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/12
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Tom, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions,
Tom <=
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Tom, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Daniel Colascione, 2010/09/09
RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/07