[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Structural regular expressions
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Structural regular expressions |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:27:39 -0700 |
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Tom <address@hidden> wrote:
> And what happens then if I want to regexp replace "foo\s-*bar"? It would
> still be susceptible to the above mentioned boundary problem, so it's
> not a robust workaround.
What about a brand new syntax class?
- Re: Structural regular expressions, (continued)
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Tom, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Tom, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Tom, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Structural regular expressions,
Daniel Colascione <=
RE: Structural regular expressions, Drew Adams, 2010/09/07