Jan Djärv<address@hidden> writes:
2010-09-26 23:59, Eli Zaretskii skrev:
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:50:38 +0200
From: Jan Djärv<address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
I wish define:s would say what they are about.
It's never too late to start documenting them (or change their names
to something self-explanatory, for that matter, if it's possible).
This case may be simple, but what does subprocesses (for exampe) mean?
It currently means !MSDOS.
IMO we should just get rid of it and replace it with !MSDOS in order to
simplify the code.
The probability that there would be a need to port the current emacs to
an OS that does not have subprocess support is very close to zero (or zero).