[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnutls for win32
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: gnutls for win32 |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jan 2012 23:40:00 +0200 |
> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:17:54 -0500
>
> EZ> I think downloading a single zip archive and unzipping it is much
> EZ> easier than adding GnuTLS to Emacs.
>
> For every Emacs user?
Only those who need it. I'm not sure what fraction would that be, but
if it's not very large, including GnuTLS in the binary package would
unnecessarily punish too many people, by letting them download a
significantly larger file.
> Can we include it in the binaries Christoph is putting out, even if
> it's not built with Emacs itself?
We could, but see above. We currently don't even include libxpm,
although it's much, much smaller.
- Re: gnutls for win32, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- GnuTLS for W32 (was: gnutls for win32), Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32 (was: gnutls for win32), Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/02