[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jan 2012 02:44:21 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 02:33, Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> wrote:
> Security default settings must be appropriate for those who are at risk.
That assumes that those at risk are many, or the cost of these
defaults are small. We can now discuss (without any real data, I
think) just how many Windows users of Emacs are at risk, and how
convenient or inconvenient is to assume distributing the GnuTLS binary
vs. pointing the users to an alternative download place.
And, just to put things in perspective, until now Emacs had no GnuTLS
support and we haven't seen a flood of network-related security
reports from Windows users.
Juanma
- Re: gnutls for win32, (continued)
- Re: gnutls for win32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: gnutls for win32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- GnuTLS for W32 (was: gnutls for win32), Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32 (was: gnutls for win32), Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/01
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/02
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/02