[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:29:17 -0800 |
The dual license is required so that the MH-E Manual can be distributed
with Debian.
Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Thanks, but I'm not looking for a way to do something like this for
> > other manuals unless it is somehow _needed_.
>
> Just out of curiosity, was it needed for the MH-E manual?
> If so, what was the need?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Bastien
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, (continued)
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?,
Bill Wohler <=
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/21
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/20
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14