Re: CEDET version

[Eric M. Ludlam]

On 01/22/2013 02:10 PM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> "Eric M. Ludlam" wrote:
>
> > > There are various things that this affects; see M-x list-packages
> > > output. semantic, srecode, inversion, pulse, ede, etc. They all have
> > > different version numbers at present.
> >
> > These used to all go out separately and were later merged into once
> > CEDET package.  Is there a reason to version-merge them?
>
> I'm not asking for any changes like that, I'm just asking for someone to
> who knows about CEDET versioning to check that all the version numbers
> the components have in Emacs make sense. Eg the first one I look at is
> semantic.el, which says:
>
>    ;; Version: 2.0
>    [...]
>    (defvar semantic-version "2.1beta"
>
> Ie, inconsistent in the same way that cedet.el is.

Ah, thanks for clarifying.  I hadn't realized the comment and variable 
were going out of sync.  A side-effect of using an incomplete script.  I 
can update the script to keep those in sync in the future the CEDET 
repository.  The variable is the correct version.

I'm not certain about the 'beta' though.  I usually put a number after 
the beta, like 2.1beta1 or some such.

Thanks
Eric