Re: CEDET version

[David Engster]

Eric M. Ludlam writes:
>> For the future, I'd rather get rid of all those separate version numbers
>> for all the sub-packages. They may have been useful back in the day, but
>> I don't think they're worth the hassle now. Let's just have one CEDET
>> version and be done with it.
>
> ...we could just remove all the version numbers, and call it CEDET 2.0.
>
> If there are dependencies out there on the version numbers, it
> shouldn't be too hard to redirect to the overall cedet version.
>
> Doing that will be more work than just running my script.  I've got
> cub-scout overload the next two weeks coming on with a pinewood
> derby. Is there a time crunch on this?

We cannot do that for the coming release, since the emacs-24 branch has
been in a freeze for quite some time now. So please let's first bump the
versions, which I'll merge to emacs-24, and then rip out the versioning
code, which I can merge to current trunk.

-David