[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req. |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2014 22:12:28 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:28:50 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Whatever environment variables it sets are effective only until the
> >> command finishes, and for that sole command.
> >
> > Yes, and what happens if that command then invokes something that is
> > not in the git's bin directory?
>
> How could that happen?
You wanna bet? I prefer an environment where I know what can and what
cannot happen.
> Those rules affects a given process. That means that the fact that
> process `foo' loaded certain DLLs does not affect which DLLs are loaded
> for process `bar', even when `bar' is executed from `foo'.
I invoked 'make' from the Bash that was installed by msysgit. That
'make' hang. The same command runs just fine from the MSYS Bash I use
for configuring and building packages. That's a fact. I think I know
the reasons, but if you want to disagree and live dangerously, that's
fine by me.
> It would be quick enough to run some common git commands from MSYS shell
> to see if it works: clone, pull, status, log...
I already tried, see above.
> BTW, there is MSYS2 [1], that comes with lots of packages (managed with
> pacman, an awesome package manager) including git. I built Emacs from
> MSYS2 a few days ago and it worked (just a small compile issue related
> to MinGW-w64.) MSYSGit is quite faster than MSYS2 git, though.
Thanks, I know about MSYS2. My current MSYS environment is well tuned
and satisfies me, so I feel no need to switch.
- Re: Apologia for bzr, (continued)
- Re: Apologia for bzr, Tassilo Horn, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/02
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/03
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Óscar Fuentes, 2014/01/04
- Re: PROPOSAL: Move to git, now that bzr is no longer a req., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/01/04