[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2014 01:16:13 +0900 |
David Kastrup writes:
> The cost-shifting is not likely to ever trigger since it is rather
> explicitly only applicable for deliberate or at least conscious
> inclusion of material from uncleared origin.
Not the one I signed. The one I signed for XEmacs in 1998 makes me
unconditionally responsible for any costs incurred by the FSF in an
unsuccessful defense of my contribution from a copyright challenge. I
have no legal protection in that event. Just the good sense of the
FSF legal staff.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Rasmus, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Rasmus, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Rasmus, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Rasmus, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/19
- RE: Emacs Lisp's future, Drew Adams, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Rasmus, 2014/09/18
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/09/19
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Emilio Lopes, 2014/09/23
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Jonas Bernoulli, 2014/09/26