[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Dec 2014 04:20:31 +0100 |
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Dropping the only language which is well known to
>> all those who write Emacs documentation is simply insane.
>
> Yes. Texinfo isn't the best language in the world, but you can make
> drive-by contributors just write plain text, and it's OK. And
> maintainers can mark up things properly.
Drive-by contributors could perhaps write in org-mode? That is pretty
easy to learn. (And conversion to texinfo is probably easy, or already
there.)
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, (continued)
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Alan Mackenzie, 2014/12/05
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/05
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/05
Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, David Kastrup, 2014/12/05
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Steinar Bang, 2014/12/06
- Re: On being web-friendly and why info must die, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/05