[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:07:19 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Currently the user can either search for "any kind of e" or "only é"
> > or "only è" or "only ê", etc.
> That would still be the case.
> The only difference would be that when s?he wants to search for "any
> kind of e" s?he can use any of the equivalent e-chars. Any of [eéèêæë]
> would behave the same as `e' does not, when searching for any of [eéèêæë].
This seems to be a miscommunication.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/10
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11