[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:28:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> current situation with case folding, that you can't paste in a search
> string with capital letters and search for it in a case-independent way.
Yes, you can: Use M-c to explicitly choose whether to case-fold or not.
> However, in the case of case folding, we solve that by downcasing
> text when pasting it into search strings. We could de-accent strings
> too when pasting them.
Actually, the way we downcase it has problems. E.g. Go to the beginning
of this paragraph (i.e. before "Actually") and do:
C-s C-w M-c
and you end up searching for an exact (non-case-folded) match of
"actually" rather than "Actually", so it won't even match the "Actually"
from which you got it.
Stefan
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08