[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2015 23:59:03 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> That is, after you figure out that Emacs has turned the tables on
> you (and there is no signal that it has - no message telling you
> that it is now searching case-sensitively),
For the automatic toggling of case-sensitivity we could display the same
message as displayed for manual toggling with ‘M-s c’.
> IOW, the automatic downcasing DWIM is used only when you use `C-M-y'
> (or `C-w') to yank some text at point into the search string. What
> was said about automatic downcasing is not true for pasting in
> general. Which points to another possibility of use confusion
> (inconsistency).
No, pasting is broken too: try to paste the upper case “A” with ‘C-s
C-y’ (isearch-yank-kill) - it's irrecoverably converted to lower case.
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/08
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/09
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?,
Juri Linkov <=
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/11
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/11
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/12
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Juri Linkov, 2015/09/08
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/09