Re: Dynamic loading progress

[David Kastrup]

Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:

> On 09/15/2015 01:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> So having our binary interfaces and calling conventions and
>> memory/exception handling default to "like Emacs does" is not just
>> Lisp-friendly but is also keeping our license enforcement options more
>> conservative. 
>
> I don't see how.

Maybe you should have read more than a single paragraph then.

-- 
David Kastrup