Re: Dynamic loading progress

[David Kastrup]

Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:

> On 09/15/2015 06:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>>> On 09/15/2015 01:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>> So having our binary interfaces and calling conventions and
>>>> memory/exception handling default to "like Emacs does" is not just
>>>> Lisp-friendly but is also keeping our license enforcement options more
>>>> conservative. 
>>>
>>> I don't see how.
>> 
>> Maybe you should have read more than a single paragraph then.
>
> Maybe you shouldn't snip the part where I explain how the rest of your
> argument is incorrect.

Your "explanation" did not fit the "rest of my argument" and discussed a
different scenario.

-- 
David Kastrup