[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:59:55 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:29:11 +0300
>
> On 09/21/2015 05:18 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > Never heard of it used for CVS (and can't find mention of it in "cvs
> > commit --help"). As for SCCS, it can use that same
> > log-edit-extract-headers for that.
>
> 'man cvs' has this: "-r tag is available with the commit and history
> commands", which follows a paragraph devoted to "-r tag[:date]".
No, that's the wrong command. We are talking about "cvs commit".
The CVS manual has this text:
commit options
--------------
[...]
`-r REVISION'
Commit to REVISION. REVISION must be either a branch, or a
revision on the main trunk that is higher than any existing
revision number (*note Assigning revisions::). You cannot commit
to a specific revision on a branch.
> Overall, it doesn't seem to be that far from a common Git workflow
> element: check out a branch (maybe create it) and commit to it.
>
> If we try hard enough, maybe we could fit both new and old backends into
> one VC workflow. Either split the operation likewise into two, for RCS
> and friends (that would be ideal, provided it's possible; and it'll also
> need a new command that allows creating a new tag/revision/branch), or
> also add the ability to "check out another branch and commit" to Git and
> newer backends.
I think another possibility is to commit a tag with the specified
REVISION string immediately after committing the current changeset.
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, (continued)
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/20
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, David Kastrup, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/21
- Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/09/20