Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 12:27:46 -0400
> 
> > But why does it have to be a separate command?  Can't "C-u C-x v v",
> > when it calls vc-checkin, present that header in the vc-log buffer, so
> > that muscle memory doesn't have to change?
> 
> Actually, removing this use of C-u is one of the main benefits, in my mind.

Probably because you have no use for the feature in the first place.
Otherwise I cannot imagine any reason why removing a prefix argument
would make you happier.