Re: Making `interactive' conditional

[Stefan Monnier]

> Right now, functions are interactive if declared with `interactive', and not
> otherwise.  The suggestion at hand is to allow `interactive' forms to become
> conditional -- possibly in multiple ways. I like this concept, and think the
> right place for it is indeed in core.

Note that it turns `commandp' from a pure function to an impure one.

I think that pretending that "foo" is not interactive just because you're
not in the right context is going too far.


        Stefan