RE: Making `interactive' conditional

[Drew Adams]

> In any case, this discussion is not about changing the default M-x,
> but about experimenting with a new M-x, probably offered as a GNU
> ELPA package.

That's good.  Thanks for clarifying that.

So we can keep that in mind from now on: Unless stated otherwise,
when we write `M-x' in this discussion we really mean an
experimental new, alternate `M-x'-like command.