|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? (Was: bug#21998: Run 'make change-history' on release branch) |
Date: | Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:22:31 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
On 03/09/2016 11:53 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
And people shouldn't need to cough up the right regex; all they need to do is run "./autogen.sh all" or "./autogen.sh git".That still misses a couple that add-change-log-entry doesn't.
Which two languages? It should be easy to fix and I can volunteer to do that.
We should get people into the habit of running autogen.sh that way, when they clone from the repository.Some of them didn't like the extra baggage that brings, though.
Yes, I remember. :-) Experts who want detailed control over every Git setting can of course configure this stuff any way they like. I just want the default to be reasonable, that's all.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |