[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-losedows-builder
From: |
Richard Copley |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-losedows-builder |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:44:28 +0100 |
On 2 September 2016 at 15:15, Kaushal Modi <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, 7:12 AM Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Or perhaps
>> you think of Microsoft as a competitor that deserves respect, rather
>> than as an enemy that has subjugated millions of people.
>
>
> Actually before you brought this up, I never thought of the "win" part in
> Windows could mean any respect at all. "Win" gives a positive message
> probably just in English language and happens to be the first part of the
> word windows. This kind of micro-digging to find ways of name calling the
> competitor does not suit well to our community. If we should find and
> advertise tangible reasons to why we are better than the competitor.
>
> For all many would care, windows might as well be foodows, and the code in
> the patch used foo- instead of win-. That "win-" part means nothing else
> than happening to be the first part of Windows. Victory flags do not go
> waving in my mind when I read some code with "win-". I believe such trivial
> refactoring feedback would be demoralizing to contributors.
I agree. The ancestor of the word "window" came from words meaning
"wind" and "eye", according to the OED, but it's natural and near-universal
to treat it as an atomic unit.
There's no particular need to use "win" as an abbreviation and it's not
very pleasing, so I don't mind trying to avoid it. The exception is when
referring to Win32 (the subsystem, the API or whatever). That's its name
and it's silly to call it anything else.
> But I agree with the similar change suggested by Glenn on the grounds of
> coding consistency.
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, (continued)
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/01
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Simon Friis Vindum, 2016/09/01
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/01
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Kaushal Modi, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder,
Richard Copley <=
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/03
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Tim Cross, 2016/09/04
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/04
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Richard Stallman, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, Emanuel Berg, 2016/09/02
- Re: emacs-losedows-builder, John Wiegley, 2016/09/01