RE: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line

[Drew Adams]

> > > > When it comes to UI, I'm in complete agreement with Eli: I love DWIM
> > > > behavior, and think this is a virtue of Emacs, not a vice in any
> > > > way.
> > >
> > > If DWIM is okay in the UI, then functions that behave in support of
> > > that UI should also be okay.
> >
> > Yes, of course.  But as I pointed out, the case at hand has
> > nothing to do with DWIM.
> 
> I disagree.

And your reason is?

A user _explicitly specifies_ which to use, of the behaviors
the command supports.  How is that guess-what-I-mean-and-do-it?

Is `forward-char` a DWIM command, simply because it can move
different distances depending on a prefix arg?  I don't think
so, but sure, feel free to disagree.