Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?

[Stefan Monnier]

> IIRC, it was not the case in older Emacsen and/or XEmacs.  If `functionp'
> behaves this way since Emacs 23, Tramp could remove the check for
> `subrp', indeed.

I do remember changing `functionp` at some point, but at least in
Emacs-21.4 (functionp (symbol-function '+)) returns non-nil.

>> IOW, if there's a kind of situation that recurs often enough to warrant
>> something like (tramp-)compat-funcall you should report this as a bug.
> `tramp-compat-funcall' is almost used for backward compatibility.
> Who shall be the target of a bug report then?

M-x report-emacs-bug.


        Stefan