Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?

[Michael Albinus]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>> There's  (if (fboundp '<foo>) (<foo> <bar>))  already (which is much
>> Your code snippet misses the `with-no-warnings' umbrella.
>
> No, it doesn't: the byte-compiler understands the the if+fboundp means
> that any call to this function in the branch is "safe" and it won't
> signal a warning.  That's my point.

With Emacs 25, yes. But there are still warnings when compiling with
Emacs 23, I  believe.

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.