[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:44:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> With Emacs 25, yes. But there are still warnings when compiling with
>> Emacs 23, I believe.
>
> As I said, if you care about the warnings you get under old Emacsen,
> I can't help you (I can understand supporting some older Emacsen, but
> worrying about the warnings they give baffles me completely).
I haven't asked for help :-)
I'm just explaining why `tramp-compat-funcall' is still used. And yes,
warning-free compilation even with older Emacsen is a benefit for me.
> Stefan
Best regards, Michael.
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, (continued)
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/09/22
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/23
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?,
Michael Albinus <=
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/25
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/09/25
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/09/24
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/25