[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?
|
From: |
John Wiegley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:12:12 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/25.2.50 (darwin) |
>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
EZ> In any case, a 13x speedup sounds very impressive, so I think we want this
EZ> on master as soon as you can do it.
EZ> What do others think?
Yes, please. :)
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/19
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, michael schuldt, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, michael schuldt, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, John Wiegley, 2017/06/22
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/06/22
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/21