[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations? |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:56:56 +0300 |
> > In any case, a 13x speedup sounds very impressive, so I think we want
> > this on master as soon as you can do it.
>
> Okay, looks like people are in favor, so I’ll try to get the more effective
> smaller patches pulled in this week.
Yes, please, and thanks.
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, (continued)
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, John Wiegley, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, michael schuldt, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, michael schuldt, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, John Wiegley, 2017/06/22
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/06/22
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?,
Eli Zaretskii <=