[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations? |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:41:29 +0300 |
> From: michael schuldt <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 19:50:59 -0700
>
> Since the time spent in GC appears so significant, why not disable GC while
> reading?
Because you can easily run out of memory that way: the amount of
memory required to read and process a given .elc file is not known in
advance.
- Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/19
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, John Wiegley, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, michael schuldt, 2017/06/20
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, michael schuldt, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, John Wiegley, 2017/06/22
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/06/22
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Richard Stallman, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Ken Raeburn, 2017/06/21
- Re: Should we land Lisp reader optimizations?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/06/21