Re: Predicate for true lists

[Paul Eggert]

Drew Adams wrote:
> By your reasoning,
> backward compatibility is a legalistic thing that
> depends on doc, not behavior.

I certainly didn't intend any such thing. Still, I'm afraid that we'll have to 
continue to disagree about what notions of compatibility are more useful, and 
about what kind of documentation is more useful. The Emacs documentation mostly 
follows the guidelines I'm suggesting, thank goodness.