[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:07:06 +0200 |
> From: Mattias Engdegård <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:43:38 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> 28 feb. 2020 kl. 22.40 skrev Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
>
> > No, let's leave the default as it is now. Those who want such
> > suspicious regular expressions flagged will customize the variable to
> > a non-default value. Like they do with the warning options of a
> > compiler.
>
> In Emacs's own compiler, all warnings are on by default:
Because they are always spot-on.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29