Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler

[Mattias Engdegård]

22 mars 2020 kl. 11.37 skrev Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:

> That's too bad, but if this is the case, I see no reason to have a primitive 
> that is not used by any command or public API.  We don't have any other 
> primitives like that, AFAIR, we only add primitives that have some uses.

Surely adding it won't hurt Emacs in the slightest or bother anyone; it's just 
a few lines. Not having it is a bit of an inconvenience to a few people 
(requires local patching).