[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Regexp bytecode disassembler
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Regexp bytecode disassembler |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Mar 2020 17:02:34 -0700 (PDT) |
> To me, `pcase' would be overkill here
... because it is more general. Like `cond', it
doesn't make clear that this is a simple case that
is exactly the case that `cl-case' handles.
Yes, the code in this case looks the same, whether
it is `pcase' or `cl-case', but the latter does
only this, so it's clear that only this is involved.
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, (continued)
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Štěpán Němec, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Paul Eggert, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/03/21
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/03/21
- RE: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Drew Adams, 2020/03/21
- RE: Regexp bytecode disassembler,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/03/21
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/21
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/22
- Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Corwin Brust, 2020/03/22
Re: Regexp bytecode disassembler, Pip Cet, 2020/03/20