[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Ema
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2020 00:07:01 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Currently, the way you answer such a question is that you look at
> the commit, try to determine the author, and check a list of
> people who have assigned copyright to see if the author is in it.
> This process is cumbersome, because few have access to the list.
> One way to make it smoother is to add an API that gives access to
> that list.
I would like to make that easier. That may be complex. We don't
publish the list, for privacy reasons. We don't want to offer
the public a way to probe the list. We can offer certain people
access to probe the list in limited ways. We need to discuss that
with the FSF.
> Indeed, currently, when you assign copyright to the FSF, you sign
> a document with a GPG key. The FSF could sign that key to
> indicate "we have received copyright papers for this author".
> Then, to verify "do we have papers for the author of this commit",
> anyone could check "is this commit signed with a key signed by the
> FSF"?
At first glance, this looks good to me. It would be necessary
for people to study it to make sure it doens't have problems.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, (continued)
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Alan Third, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/12
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/13
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/14
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/13