[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on helm substantial differences
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: on helm substantial differences |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2020 05:24:33 +0200 |
> From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, bugs@gnu.support, ghe@sdf.org,
> spacibba@aol.com, andreyk.mad@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:41:06 +0200
>
> > This will have to be an opt-in feature. It presents completion
> > candidates in such a radically different form that people will be
> > confused; I would be. We cannot change the default behavior so
> > radically, and on top of that make the display different in each mode.
>
> Like there are already possible choices 'horizontal' and 'vertical'
> in the user option 'completions-format', it could also support
> a new choice like 'rich'.
That'd be fine, I think. But we should try to come up with a name
that is more descriptive, for example 'mode-specific' or something, to
make it more explicit that this is not just about arranging the
candidates on display.
- Re: on helm substantial differences, (continued)
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/16
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Juri Linkov, 2020/11/16
- RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/16
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Juri Linkov, 2020/11/16
- RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/16
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Juri Linkov, 2020/11/17
- RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/17
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Protesilaos Stavrou, 2020/11/17
- RE: on helm substantial differences, Drew Adams, 2020/11/17
- Re: on helm substantial differences, Juri Linkov, 2020/11/17
- Re: on helm substantial differences,
Eli Zaretskii <=