Re: on helm substantial differences

[Juri Linkov]

>> > `rich' is a poor choice, IMO - it doesn't mean much.
>>
>> This is a reference to the package ivy-rich
>
> Might as well call it `enhanced', `special', `super',
> or `wonderful'.  Does "rich" have a meaning that
> suggests something here other than "full" or "great"?

If you don't like "rich" do you think "wise" is better?

Whereas current completions are column-oriented,
completions in the proposed format are line-wise.