RE: [External] : Re: Smarter M-x that filters on major-mode

[Drew Adams]

> > There seems to be an assumption here that the defining info
> > to hiding a command (or not) is the current major mode.
> >
> > While it's an important case, I think it'd be a mistake to design
> > a feature that can only use such tests.  There are many other useful
> > conditions that one might like to test, such as the activation of the
> > region, the existence of some other buffer, etc...

My thoughts too.

> Commands bound to modes cover 97% of the cases,
> my stats dept. informs me,

Really?  Could you please post what's behind those
stats?

And maybe say just what you mean by "commands
bound to modes".  Do you mean commands whose only
reasonable use is only within a given mode?

How did you measure this?