Re: Smarter M-x that filters on major-mode

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> I've now separated all the related changes into a series of hopefully
> sensible patches, and pushed to the trunk.

Thanks!

I'm curious, though: if (interactive ARG MODES...) is neither forward
nor backward compatible, and is equivalent to
(declare (modes MODES...)), then why not allow only the latter syntax?
Or am I missing something?

-- 
Basil