[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local.
|
From: |
Richard Copley |
|
Subject: |
Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local. |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Feb 2021 23:31:29 +0000 |
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> Why is goto-line-history buffer local? This seems to me to be a step
> backwards, for precisely the reason that making search history buffer
> local would be a bad thing.
I agree. I've been locally patching out that part of the commit since
a few months after it was introduced, which was at the end of 2019, as
Óscar points out.
- goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Alan Mackenzie, 2021/02/14
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/14
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local.,
Richard Copley <=
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., martin rudalics, 2021/02/15
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Alan Mackenzie, 2021/02/15
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Juri Linkov, 2021/02/16
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Alan Mackenzie, 2021/02/16
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Matt Armstrong, 2021/02/16
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Rolf Ade, 2021/02/17
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Alan Mackenzie, 2021/02/18
- Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local., Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/02/18