Re: goto-line-history should not be buffer local.

[Philip Kaludercic]

Rolf Ade <rolf@pointsman.de> writes:

> Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org> writes:
>>
>> Who are the people who would set the option back to buffer local
>> history?
>
> I will do. (Would prefer it's the default.)

Seconding this.

> What meaning have a certain line number from one buffer in another
> buffer?

One argument was that you might accidentally type M-g M-g in the wrong
buffer, and would want to easily switch the buffer and repeat the last
goto-line request.

-- 
        Philip K.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature