Re: [ELPA] A Setup package

[Philip Kaludercic]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> I think all the issues should now be resolved. I just pushed a commit
>> adding edebug support.  setup-help was moved into setup's docstring, a
>> lot of the macros were redefined to look more like setq, and all macros
>> were redefined to use keywords (for now).
>
> [ I have some further suggestions for the code, but they'll come later.  ]
>
> I was about to add it to GNU ELPA, but I noticed two problems:
>
> 1- The file is missing a copyright notice and it is using the CC0 license.
>    See the patch below to fix those issues (the copyright part reflects
>    the fact that you consider the package as being covered by your
>    copyright assignment and the license change is because we want to
>    distribute all GNU ELPA packages under the GPLv3 license; you're of
>    course perfectly free to also distribute this package under any other
>    license you want, but we want to use the GPLv3 for the copy we
>    distribute).

Done.

> 2- AFAIK you rebased (or force-pushed or something like that) your
>    branch, which makes it painful for any"one" tracking your branch, such
>    as elpa.git.  In order for the elpa.git branch tracking your
>    SourceHut repository to work sanely it'll be important not to rebase
>    (or force-push...) in the future.

I actually created a new repository, because it seemed cleaner compared
to pushing all the changes as commits.  But I will keep this in mind for
the future.

-- 
        Philip K.